Which legal case reinforced that race discrimination is illegal in the sale of personal property as well as real estate?

The case that reinforced that race discrimination is illegal in the sale of personal property as well as real estate is Jones vs. Mayer. This landmark Supreme Court case, decided in 1968, effectively expanded the interpretation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibited discrimination based on race in property transactions. The ruling established that the act applies not only to real estate but also to personal property, affirming that individuals cannot be denied the ability to buy or sell property based on their race. This decision underscored the principle that equality in housing and property rights is both a legal and moral obligation, thereby reinforcing anti-discrimination laws.

Other options pertain to different legal principles or issues. Shelly vs. Kraemer addressed the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in real estate, while Walker vs. City of Birmingham involved civil rights demonstrations and does not focus specifically on property sales. Regents of the University of California vs. Bakke focused on affirmative action in education, not directly related to property transactions. Each of these cases contributes to the broader conversation about civil rights, but Jones vs. Mayer is the primary case regarding direct discrimination in property sales.